The True Cost of Meetings: Understanding Their Hidden Impact
Written on
Chapter 1: The Expense of Meetings
Meetings can often be more costly than merely the time invested by participants.
Just as a carpenter wouldn't rely solely on a hammer for every job, nor would a mechanic use only a single wrench, the corporate world needs a varied toolkit. Knowing which tool to apply to a specific task is crucial. However, in many organizations, the concept of utilizing the right tool for the right problem seems foreign. Frequently, the go-to solution for any corporate challenge is to convene a meeting or, even better, establish a working group that meets regularly.
There are significant drawbacks to this approach. Firstly, meetings aren't always the most effective means of addressing an issue, despite their importance in certain contexts. There are numerous methods of collaboration, and meetings should merely be one of the tools in the corporate toolkit. Secondly, the costs associated with meetings can be staggering. Consider the financial implications of gathering twelve individuals for a couple of hours, as their salaries accumulate rapidly. It's likely that if organizations conducted cost-benefit analyses of meetings, they would find themselves holding fewer of them.
However, the direct costs tied to the participants' time are just the beginning. Similar to a pebble tossed into a calm lake, the ripple effects of meetings can extend far and wide.
Section 1.1: The Meeting Culture
An effective meeting is characterized by a clear agenda, pre-distributed materials, and a summary with action items following the discussion. Regular meetings often begin with a review of outstanding action points. While this structured approach can enhance meetings, it also requires considerable time investment, which translates into financial costs. Eventually, the need for a secretariat to manage meetings can arise, leading to the creation of roles that necessitate justification and expansion.
Sooner than one might expect, having agendas and minutes can evolve into an entire industry, with dedicated teams focused solely on these tasks. Regardless of the value of the meetings themselves, one must question whether they warrant the associated expenditures. Those tasked with these responsibilities are typically not the issue; like the rest of us, they strive to fulfill their duties effectively.
When planning a meeting, especially a recurring one, it's vital to contemplate how quickly the bureaucracy surrounding the meeting can escalate and demand more time and resources than the actual work intended to be advanced.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Disruption of Focus
If a meeting is scheduled from 10 to 11, some individuals can work diligently right up until 9:59, attend the meeting, and resume their tasks at 11:01. However, in my experience, such individuals are exceedingly rare. Many of us struggle to engage with tasks when a meeting looms, finding it difficult to concentrate on projects we won't finish before needing to pause. Transitioning back to a productive state after a meeting can also take significant time.
Consequently, a single hour-long meeting can consume twice that amount of time from someone's workday. If meetings are scattered throughout the day, the opportunities for focused, meaningful work can become virtually nonexistent. Is this truly what employers desire from their teams?
Section 1.2: The Inefficiency Factor
In the majority of meetings I've attended, only a small group of participants does most of the talking. While some attendees may glean useful information, for many, only a fraction of the discussion is pertinent or engaging. Such inefficiency is unlikely to be tolerated in other areas of work.
One solution is to adopt a more structured and focused approach, ensuring everyone knows beforehand what will be discussed and whether their presence is necessary. If a timed agenda is established, individuals can attend only the segments that concern them. Unfortunately, many meetings devolve into lengthy discussions dominated by a few (often senior) voices.
An argument often made for compelling attendance is to keep everyone informed of "important" updates. However, if the information is truly essential, what about those unable to attend due to illness, vacation, or other commitments? If the update is indeed crucial, it will need to be communicated via email to ensure everyone receives it. If that's the case, why hold the costly and inefficient meeting at all?
Moreover, there are instances when the meeting chair insists on utilizing the full scheduled time, regardless of necessity. It's clear to most when this occurs, and nearly everyone would prefer a meeting to conclude earlier than planned, even if it means finishing within just a few minutes. This raises the question of whether a meeting was the right solution from the outset.
Chapter 2: The Broader Implications
Some individuals thrive in meeting environments and struggle to go long without interacting with others. While this is their preference, it would be ideal for such interactions to occur among like-minded individuals. Conversely, many of us do not find meetings to be conducive to our natural working style. After a couple of hours of meetings, I often find myself unable to accomplish much else. I'm not alone in feeling this way; not everyone is a social butterfly who relishes constant meetings.
There are also practical considerations to bear in mind. If you frequently find yourself scheduling time with a leader simply to allow them to perform a fundamental aspect of their job amidst a sea of meetings, it’s clear that something is amiss. Meetings should complement core responsibilities, not overshadow them.
Remembering Other Tools Available
While meetings can be an effective means of collaboration, generating ideas, or reaching consensus, they are only one approach among many. When overused, meetings can rapidly consume significant resources and become challenging to curtail. They may alienate as many employees as they engage, morphing into an unintended bureaucracy without anyone noticing.
By treating meetings like any other tool and applying the appropriate strategy for each situation, substantial savings can be achieved.
This video discusses the hidden costs associated with meetings and how they can affect your company's bottom line.
This video explores the importance of evaluating the time spent in meetings, particularly in relation to productivity in a Shopify context.