Dear Bill, as the head of NASA, your recent acknowledgment of UFOs as real phenomena and the green light for your teams to investigate these mysteries raises an important question: why does Mission Control consistently cut the feed whenever something intriguing appears on camera? It’s frustrating for those interested in science that the ISS cameras pick up potential anomalies, yet the footage is interrupted. While it might be debris, the lack of interest in what shares the ISS's orbit is concerning. Is the situation so dire that you prefer to keep the public in the dark about the ISS's frequent close encounters?

Continuous camera operation should equate to continuous coverage. I can’t help but wonder, do the ISS images belong to NASA or to the global community? If it’s the latter, interruptions are unacceptable! It would be beneficial to have all available cameras stream simultaneously, allowing the public to observe firsthand. Moreover, the claim of signal loss is puzzling—given Elon Musk's satellite deployments, should we really be experiencing these disruptions?

The signal disruptions during the Apollo missions were understandable, but in today’s technological landscape, it seems oddly timed that these losses coincide with potential discoveries. Has anyone examined the statistics of signal loss in relation to UFO sightings? Would these occurrences meet the standards of statistical significance?

Remember the unusual rock in the Kuiper Belt that captured your attention? You named it Arawn—why not assign it a more conventional designation like A-24571914? Naming it after a Welsh deity raises eyebrows, especially given that all celestial bodies are typically named after mythological figures.

Unless this naming convention is a promotion for an episode of a science fiction series! It’s curious that NASA appears to invoke ancient deities and esoteric traditions. The object’s trajectory and characteristics have been labeled “weird” by scientists. But what does that mean? In the realm of space, aren’t unusual trajectories expected due to collisions and gravitational interactions?

The spin of this object is also deemed “weird.” When scientists use such vague terminology, it often leads to speculation about extraterrestrial involvement. Measuring 133 kilometers in diameter, this object is substantial—definitely more than just ice or rock. Given its rotation, those materials would likely disintegrate. Yet, you directed the New Horizons mission toward this object only to lose contact shortly thereafter.

The narrative surrounding the telemetry issues suggests that there may have been interference. How can this be determined? It seems far-fetched to assert that the telemetry was jammed without concrete evidence. Such claims could imply that we were receiving signals from an artificial source, hinting at non-human intelligence.

The number of coincidences in space is staggering. I’d like to see some statistical analyses demonstrating that these failures occur at expected rates. How likely is it that a malfunction resolves itself precisely when out of range of Arawn? This raises serious questions about the integrity of the explanations provided.

Turning our attention to Avi Loeb’s assertions, he encourages exploration for artifacts in space. Are we overlooking significant evidence of extraterrestrial technology? The Galileo Project aims to identify such artifacts near Earth, potentially altering our understanding of the cosmos.

Previous missions and discoveries, like the controversial Face on Mars, continue to fuel debate. Despite dismissing it, the public witnessed evidence of blue skies on Mars—an indication of atmospheric conditions that shouldn’t be ignored.

So why does NASA deactivate the ISS camera feeds when intriguing objects appear? If the objective is transparency, why not implement a delay in broadcasting rather than cutting the footage entirely? This raises suspicions about what you might be trying to conceal.

Furthermore, why has there been a lack of follow-up on the Viking tests that indicated life on Mars? Shouldn’t verification of such findings be a priority for scientific inquiry?

Lastly, why did that Russian mission go silent, and what about the allegations that the US shot down one of their probes? There are rumors of top-secret space operations that seem to contradict the transparency that should be expected from space agencies.

In conclusion, my request is simple: don’t censor our view of the ISS. Allow the public to observe and draw their own conclusions. Even if signal loss persists, the recordings should be available. Can we please receive high-definition footage of any UFO sightings?

Also, can someone clarify why China’s Space Agency broadcasts US Space Force emblems in their feeds? Are we collaborating on a deeper level than we realize?