In today's technology-saturated environment, the balance between benefit and detriment is increasingly precarious. While we enjoy the ease of instant access to information and communication, our focus is incessantly pulled by the vibrant, multi-sensory stimuli that technology presents. The shift from basic text interfaces to rich graphical user experiences marked the beginning of this transformation. We now inhabit an immersive world filled with high-definition visuals and crisp audio, where devices not only inform but also demand our attention through tailored alerts and notifications.

For instance, when Larry D. Rosen hears a familiar tune ring from his iPhone, he instinctively knows to answer, anticipating a pleasant conversation with a loved one. Conversely, the sound of an alarm notification elicits an immediate desire to dismiss the call. This dichotomy illustrates how technology has conditioned us to respond to certain cues based on past experiences.

The relentless competition for our attention has become a fundamental aspect of digital marketing, as capturing "eyeballs" is synonymous with generating revenue. Each glance at our devices reveals a barrage of notifications—unread emails, social media updates, and reminders—leading to an overwhelming array of choices about where to direct our focus first. This constant influx of information appears to have eroded our capacity to enjoy solitude and reflect internally.

Media multitasking, characterized not by simultaneous task execution but by rapid shifts between activities, pervades all areas of life, including personal, educational, and professional settings. A recent study tracked both younger and older adults, revealing that while younger individuals switched tasks 27 times per hour, older adults did not fare much better, with 17 switches per hour. Linda Stone, a former Microsoft executive, referred to this phenomenon as "continuous partial attention." The more frequently we switch tasks, the more detrimental the impact on our overall productivity.

Determining the extent of task-switching behavior is challenging without monitoring all personal devices. Nevertheless, various studies have attempted to quantify this behavior. For instance, Rosen's lab found that students studying in a familiar environment could maintain focus for only three to five minutes, even when engaged with significant material. This aligns with findings from Gloria Mark's research, which indicated that IT professionals experience similar levels of distraction.

Further studies have revealed that individuals across all age groups are increasingly multitasking, often to the detriment of concentration. For example, a survey of over 3,000 Dutch teens and adults indicated that multitasking was prevalent, with adolescents engaging in dual-tasking nearly a third of their day. Interestingly, while younger individuals favored mixing music with online activities, older generations preferred traditional media combinations.

The growing inclination to multitask has resulted in a decline in our ability to focus on a single task. Observations in various social settings reveal a collective inability to engage in idle moments, as many individuals seem more invested in their devices than the physical interactions occurring around them. The average response time to incoming emails has also diminished, with individuals checking messages within a minute and forty-four seconds of receipt.

Research from Rosen's lab has uncovered a steady increase in how frequently people check their devices, particularly among younger generations, who typically check their smartphones every 15 minutes or less. The average college student owns around seven tech devices, while older adults are not far behind. The shift from reading in-depth materials to skimming text and favoring short messages reflects our adaptation to an environment rich in distractions. Studies show that our reading habits have transformed, with our eyes following an "F" pattern across screens rather than progressing linearly through text.

Impatience has become a collective trait, illustrated by a study from the University of Massachusetts, which found that viewers abandon online videos if buffering exceeds two seconds. This impatience has led to a reevaluation of our attention spans, with recent research suggesting we may be more inclined to switch tasks within mere milliseconds.

In work environments, technological disruptions have become commonplace, as employees are frequently interrupted by colleagues and electronic communications. A study tracking employees in an Australian telecommunications company revealed that most work tasks lasted under ten minutes, with self-generated interruptions accounting for a significant portion of these disruptions.

In educational contexts, students are often distracted by personal devices during class, with many using laptops for non-academic purposes. Research indicates that students studying outside of class also exhibit similar multitasking behaviors, with many checking social media or texting during study sessions, which detracts from their focus on essential coursework.

To mitigate the adverse effects of these interruptions, we can adopt two primary strategies: altering our brain function and modifying our behavioral patterns. These approaches are not mutually exclusive but rather complementary, and engaging in both simultaneously may yield the best results.

Efforts to enhance cognitive control through various means—such as education, meditation, physical activity, and technology—are underway globally. This represents a pivotal moment, as the very technology that has contributed to our distracted minds is now being harnessed to foster improvement. Learning from historical shifts in behavior, we can adapt to our circumstances and make informed choices regarding our interactions with technology.

1. Marci, C. A (Biometric) Day in the Life: Engaging across Media. Paper presented at Re:Think 2012, New York (2012).
2. Rose, E. Continuous partial attention: reconsidering the role of online learning in the age of interruption. Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education 50, 41–46 (2010).
3. Rosen, L.D., Carrier, L.M., & Cheever, N.A. Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 948–958 (2013).
4. Gonzalez, V.M. & Mark, G. Constant, constant, multitasking craziness: Managing multiple working spheres. in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems New York: ACM Press, 113–120 (2004).
5. Voorveld, H.A.M. & van der Goot, M. Age differences in media multitasking: A diary study. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 57, 392–408 (2013).
6. Carrier, L.M., Cheever, N.A., Rosen, L.D., Benitez, S., & Chang, J. “Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 483–489 (2009).
7. MarketingCharts, “College Students Own an Average of 7 Tech Devices,” June 18, 2013. http://www.marketingcharts.com/wp/online/college-students-own-an-average-of-7-tech-devices-30430
8. 10. Nielsen, “F-shaped Pattern for Reading Web Content,” April 17, 2006. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/f-shaped-pattern-reading-web-content/
9. Krishnan, S.S. & Sitaraman, R.K. Video stream quality impacts viewer behavior: Inferring causality using quasi-experimental designs. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) 21, 2001–2014 (2013).
10. Jupiter Research, Retail Web Site Performance, June 2006. http://www.akamai.com/html/about/press/releases/2006/press_110606.html
11. SLohr, S. “For Impatient Web Users, an Eye Blink Is Just Too Long to Wait” The New York Times (2012).
12. Wajcman, J. & Rose, E. Constant connectivity: Rethinking interruptions at work. Organizational Studies 32, 941–961 (2011).
13. Iqbal, S.T. & Horvitz, E. Disruption and recovery of computing tasks: Field study, analysis, and directions. CHI 2007: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems New York: ACM Press (2007).
14. Charman-Anderson, S. “Breaking the Email Compulsion” The Guardian (2008).
15. Marulanda-Carter, L. & Jackson, T.W. Effects of e-mail addiction and interruptions on employees. Journal of Systems and Information Technology 14, 82–94 (2012).
16. Jackson, T., Dawson, R., & Wilson, D. Case study: Evaluating the effect of email interruptions within the workplace. in Proceedings of EASE 2002: 6th International Conference on Empirical Assessment and Evaluation in Software Engineering (2012).
17. Hair, M., Renaud, K.V., & Ramsay, J. The influence of self-esteem and locus of control on perceived email-related stress. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 2791–2803 (2007).
18. Renaud, K., Ramsay, J., & Hair, M. ‘You’ve got e-mail!’ … Shall I deal with it now? Electronic mail from the recipient’s perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 21, 313–332 (2007).
19. Hammer, R., et al. Mobile culture in college lectures: instructors’ and students’ perspectives. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects 6, 293–304 (2010).
20. Tindell, D.R. & Bohlander, R.W. The use and abuse of cell phones and text messaging in the classroom: A survey of college students. College Teaching 60, 1–9 (2012).
21. Judd, T. Making sense of multitasking: Key behaviors. Computers and Education 63, 358–367 (2013).
22. Calderwood, C., Ackerman, P.L., & Conklin, E.M. What else do college students ‘do’ while studying? An investigation of multitasking. Computers and Education 75, 19–29 (2014).
23. Wang, Z. & Tchernev, J.M. The myth of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication 62, 493–513 (2012).
24. Wang, Z., quoted in Nauert, R. “Multitasking Seems to Serve Emotional, not Productivity Needs,” PsychCentral (2012). http://psychcentral.com/news/2012/05/01/multitasking-seems-to-serve-emotional-not-productivity-needs/38057.html
25. Rosen, L.D., Carrier, L.M., & Cheever, N.A. Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 948–958 (2013).

Adam Gazzaley is a professor in the departments of neurology, physiology, and psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco, where he is also the founding director of the Neuroscience Imaging Center, Neuroscape Lab, and the Gazzaley Lab. Recipient of the 2015 Society for Neuroscience Science Educator Award, he wrote and hosted the nationally televised PBS special *The Distracted Mind with Dr. Adam Gazzaley.*

Larry D. Rosen is Professor Emeritus of Psychology at California State University, Dominguez Hills. He is a blogger for *Psychology Today and the author of iDisorder: Understanding Our Obsession with Technology and Overcoming Its Hold on Us and six other books.*

From *The Distracted Mind by Adam Gazzaley and Larry D. Rosen, published by the MIT Press.*