Background — Aristotle and Strato

In ancient Greece during the 4th century B.C., Aristotle asserted that the speed of a free-falling object was tied to its weight and inversely related to the density of the medium it fell through. While he acknowledged some form of acceleration, he did not explore it deeply.

A few decades later, Strato challenged Aristotle's idea of constant speed for falling bodies. He noted that a stone dropped from a greater height created a larger impact than one dropped from a lower height, implying that acceleration was indeed a factor.

Fast forward to the 17th century, and Galileo became intrigued by this topic, aiming to correct what he perceived as scientific misconceptions.

Misunderstandings of the Era and Galileo's Resolution

During the 16th and 17th centuries, scientists largely accepted the idea of acceleration, largely due to its elusiveness to the naked eye. Many researchers resorted to observing objects sinking in water to grasp the concept. They noted an initial acceleration followed by a constant speed, allowing the idea to go largely unchallenged.

By this time, Galileo had already debunked Aristotle's claim that free-fall speed was weight-dependent. In one of his writings, he demonstrated that a heavy ball and a lighter ball would hit the ground simultaneously when dropped from the Leaning Tower of Pisa. He acknowledged that air resistance affects lighter objects but concluded that when air resistance (or friction) is minimal, the speed should be equal.

Here’s a notable experiment from Apollo 15 that corroborates Galileo's findings:

Galileo realized he needed to diminish the impact of gravity to comprehend the phenomenon fully, while also ensuring that this alteration did not interfere with free-fall mechanics, as water would.

The Acceleration Hypothesis

Galileo proposed that a falling object experiences uniform acceleration. In other words, it increases its speed by the same amount in equal time intervals. If an object falls from rest, it would be moving twice as fast after two seconds compared to one second. Similarly, after three seconds, it would be falling three times as fast as after one second.

Equipped with this hypothesis and an understanding of the friction caused by water, Galileo set out to design a practical experiment. He needed to slow down the effects of gravity without altering the free-fall mechanics.

Slowing Down the Effects of Gravity

Eventually, Galileo devised an inventive solution. He created a ramp measuring about 5.5 meters in length, 0.2 meters in width, and three finger-breadths thick (a common measurement convention of that time).

He carved a channel about one finger wide along its edge, polished it, and lined it with smooth parchment. The ramp was sloped at a height of 0.5 to 1 meter at one end. He then took a smooth, round bronze ball and rolled it down the groove.

This experimentation was not instantaneous; he meticulously adjusted heights, angles, and various objects to refine the setup. His careful adjustments allowed him to effectively slow the effects of gravity while ensuring that wind resistance had a negligible impact on the results. He also minimized the friction between the ball and the ramp to preserve the ratio of free-fall acceleration.

Measuring Acceleration

Once the setup was established, Galileo rolled the ball down the ramp. He recorded the time taken for the ball to traverse the entire length of the ramp as well as shorter sections, such as three-fourths, half, and a quarter. He repeated each trial hundreds of times to ensure that measurement deviations did not exceed “one-tenth of a pulse-beat.”

How to "Hear" Acceleration?

Since detecting acceleration due to gravity is challenging visually, Galileo proposed the innovative idea that one could hear acceleration! He employed the ramp and ball apparatus and placed bells along the ball's path as it rolled down the ramp. This allowed observers to hear the bells ringing as the ball passed.

When the bells were equally spaced along the ramp, the tones became progressively faster. Utilizing the data from his water-clock experiments, Galileo adjusted the positions of the bells.

Ultimately, when he arranged the bells according to the ratios (where the distance between each pair of bells increased exponentially down the ramp), the tones from the bells were evenly distributed. For instance, if the ramp was 8 meters long, placing the bells at 1, 2, 4, and 8 meters produced uniform tones.

Galileo fine-tuned the bell placements to ascertain the value of acceleration due to gravity, establishing that acceleration is related to the square of the distance.

What Can We Learn from This?

In our contemporary world, we enjoy the advantages of advanced solutions to our basic problems, with technology playing a central role in nearly every aspect of life.

As young students aspire to contribute meaningfully to society, mastering relevant technological skills has become essential.

However, there is a growing concern that resourcefulness is diminishing when it comes to innovation and problem-solving.

Resourcefulness, in this context, refers to achieving more with fewer resources. This principle could be extended to encompass more environmentally friendly solutions and more humane technologies.

Galileo's approach to tackling complex problems with limited resources serves as an inspiration for all of us, urging a return to fundamental principles.

> We can benefit by addressing problems at a conceptual level before resorting to computational or automated solutions.

I hope you found this article both interesting and informative. If you'd like to support my work as an author, consider clapping, following, and subscribing.

For further reading, you might enjoy: Logarithms: The Long Forgotten Story of Scientific Progress and The Exciting Journey of Calculus.