# Male-Centric Myths in Science: Their Impact on Society Today
Written on
Chapter 1: The Myths Surrounding Mammals
For a long time, the scientific community has operated under the assumption that male mammals are typically larger than their female counterparts. However, the foundation of this belief is shaky at best. When Charles Darwin introduced this notion in his 1871 work, The Descent of Man, he provided scant evidence to support it. This idea quickly gained traction, aligning with the prevailing narrative of male superiority, despite later studies contradicting it.
Recent research published in Nature Communications has scrutinized sexual dimorphism—the size differences between male and female mammals—and revealed that this phenomenon is far from universal. An analysis of 429 mammal species across 66 families showed that males were heavier than females in only 45% of cases, while females were larger in 16%. In 39% of the species, males and females were nearly equal in size, and the differences observed were not particularly pronounced.
This indicates that the extent of sexual dimorphism has been overstated, largely because well-known species like lions and gorillas, where males are larger, have dominated scientific study. In contrast, species that defy this trend, such as rabbits and bats, have been significantly overlooked.
The first video, The Men Who Ate Poison For Science, provides insight into the historical context of scientific research and the male-centric narratives that have influenced it.
Chapter 2: Primate Dominance and Its Assumptions
In addition to mammals, primate species have also been analyzed through a male-dominant lens. Notably studied are baboons, gorillas, and chimpanzees, which have perpetuated the belief that male primates consistently dominate females, suggesting that this extends to Homo sapiens as well.
However, this notion has faced significant scrutiny, especially as more women have entered primatology since the late twentieth century. Current understanding reveals that many primate societies feature females in leadership roles, or exhibit gender equality. A recent study of 79 primate species found that in 42% of these, females were either dominant or on equal footing with males.
Despite this, the disparity in research continues, with Google Scholar yielding over 350,000 results for male-dominated baboons, compared to just one-fifth that number for female-dominated lemurs.
The second video, Tracing the Roots of Toxic Masculinity, delves into the cultural implications of these long-held beliefs and their consequences on societal norms.
Subsection 2.1: The Myth of Man the Hunter
The narrative of 'Man the Hunter' gained traction in the 1960s, suggesting that hunting was the driving force behind human evolution and that men, being the primary hunters, naturally assumed leadership roles. This aligns with ancient ideologies that viewed women as inferior.
The implications of these beliefs for modern science are profound. If it is assumed that only men played significant roles in history, archaeological findings of hunters and warriors are naturally classified as male. This has led to misclassifications, such as a high-ranking Viking warrior once thought to be male, but later identified as female, and the misattribution of numerous ancient burial sites.
Despite evidence suggesting the presence of egalitarian and female-dominated societies throughout history, these narratives have been largely ignored. Findings, such as the prevalence of female handprints in cave art, further challenge the male-centric view that has long prevailed.
Subsection 2.2: Biological Misconceptions
The misunderstandings extend into biology, where early theories proposed by figures like Nicolaas van Hartsoeker implied that sperm contained a miniature version of a person, attributing creation to men rather than women. This idea, while largely dismissed, led to the popular but inaccurate 'sperm race' narrative, which continues to influence both public perception and educational materials.
The impact of androcentrism has been extensive. It has not only skewed scientific inquiry but has also marginalized women's contributions, a phenomenon known as the Matilda Effect. Today, women in science still face significant obstacles, including less funding and recognition compared to their male counterparts.
In conclusion, it is crucial to challenge these outdated myths and strive for a more accurate understanding of gender roles in both scientific inquiry and societal structures. The persistence of these stereotypes perpetuates inequalities that affect everyone, and as we continue to uncover truths about our past, we must remain vigilant against the overpowering influence of male-centric narratives.
If you appreciate this content and wish to support it, consider buying me a cup of coffee! For more insights, subscribe to my Substack or follow me on social media.