Question: I wish to delve deeper into beliefs, proof, science, intuition, and the need to respect others’ beliefs when they differ from my own. Please assist.

Answer:

We perceive two primary issues at play here. The first revolves around personal growth and evolution, while the second concerns not only respecting others but also valuing diversity and maintaining an open mind to foster growth and change.

We have emphasized numerous times the significance of honoring the rights and beliefs of others. This respect is something that everyone longs for and deserves. Acknowledging others’ beliefs and choices is vital and serves as a foundation for equality. Without this fundamental aspect, there can be no peace on any scale. While embracing differences is preferable, acceptance and respect are absolute necessities.

All beliefs and truths have their place, regardless of whether they align. To hold something as true is an individual right, and a personal truth should be deemed absolute solely for that individual. Even then, such absolute truths can evolve or even become irrelevant over time. This doesn’t imply that the individual was wrong; rather, it signifies their growth, and their beliefs have adapted accordingly.

It would benefit humanity to approach beliefs and truths as relative and evolving, rather than seeing them as rigid absolutes. Seek and uncover your truth, but maintain an open mindset that fosters growth. When deciding whether to believe in something, consider all relevant information, including scientific evidence, diverse perspectives, verified facts, intuition, research, and personal experiences. If you prefer to rely solely on proven facts, that’s valid, but remember that many scientific truths remain unproven, and numerous previously accepted facts have been debunked. Science, like intuition, beliefs, faith, and perspectives, is in a state of constant evolution.

One could argue that there is a unique strength in accepting a belief as true without requiring proof. Moreover, what constitutes proof is often subjective, varying by situation and person. For instance, our channel hears us, interacts with us, and values the wisdom we share. To her, our communication is proof in itself. She has personal experience of this connection. Not everyone knows how to achieve what she does, but her lived experience is valid. Should she dismiss this just because others have not experienced it?

Science is beginning to develop technologies that support claims such as channeling and other psychic phenomena; however, this validation is not necessary for her belief, as her experiences speak for themselves. Whether others believe her remains their individual choice. Some accept it, others do not, but this is her truth and reality, requiring no further proof. She embodies it.

She has amassed nearly 5000 followers on this platform alone. We have guided many to her work—some believe it, while others remain skeptical. Nonetheless, many have gained from her insights and our messages. That is our intent, and we find contentment in knowing that people have benefited, regardless of their beliefs about her connection to us.

Neither she nor we attempt to provide proof or persuade anyone regarding the validity of her insights or our existence. We leave interpretation up to individuals, without concern for whether they believe in her or us.

What we wish to convey is this: If you choose not to believe in the Archangels, we harbor no offense. We hope you can still derive benefit from our messages; if not, we continue to extend our love and best wishes. We remain available to anyone who seeks us, even if they doubt our existence. We are always on your side, ready to assist however we can. Even if you never come to believe in us during this lifetime, we will stand by you, not to convince you of our legitimacy, but because of our unconditional love for you. Our support is not limited to those who believe in us.

For those who deride or attack believers in us, the Creator, or other unproven concepts, we encourage you to reflect on your motivations (though we recognize that these individuals may not read this). Why insult those whose beliefs diverge from your own? Do you envy their ability to hold beliefs without proof? Are you distressed by their peace and happiness?

What troubles your peace when you encounter someone who has faith in concepts you deem invalid? Why do you feel entitled to your beliefs while denying others the same right? Why do you regard your beliefs as superior or more significant?

Surely, you cannot assert that science has uncovered all there is to know, especially with new discoveries emerging regularly. So, why dismiss all that remains unproven? More importantly, why criticize others who do not require the same level of proof to believe?

We do not seek answers to these questions; we merely suggest that contemplating them could reveal deeper truths.

There is nothing wrong with needing scientific proof to hold a belief, nor with accepting beliefs that lack empirical support. Each person must make sense of the world in their own way. Their understanding does not necessarily need to be shared with others. Individual methods of comprehension vary, and they are only true or false as they pertain to the individual.

Humanity must eventually reach a point where all beliefs are acknowledged and respected, regardless of personal agreement. It is not necessary to accept them as truth, but one must recognize that others do and honor their right to do so. If certain beliefs do not resonate with you, set them aside for yourself and embrace your own, but do not expect others to abandon their beliefs simply because you disagree. That mindset is unwise and unreasonable, leading to numerous problems that will ultimately return to haunt you.

Until society can accept that each individual must determine their own beliefs and honor that right, peace, harmony, and equality will remain elusive. Instead, we will witness conflict, animosity, fear, and persecution, which serve no one and will eventually impact everyone. What kind of world do you wish to inhabit: one that respects differences or one that persecutes them and those who hold them?

We send you all Love and Light.

Final Thoughts

The Angels pose some thought-provoking questions, don't you think? If someone bases their beliefs solely on scientifically validated data, that is certainly their choice. However, why attack those who have expanded their understanding to include experiences, intuition, faith, and common sense? Why do people feel compelled to challenge the beliefs of others simply because they disagree?

How is this different from the religious zealots who impose their beliefs as truths based on their own standards of proof? Wouldn't it be more beneficial for everyone to acknowledge that each person perceives truth differently and is entitled to their beliefs? Nothing is infallible, whether in science, faith, intuition, or any other realm.

I don't believe that science is the sole arbiter of truth, at least not in my own experience. Science is not omniscient; if it were, there would be nothing left to discover. Intuition is not all-knowing either, as it necessitates discernment, as my friend Marcus has reminded me. Faith-based beliefs may resonate with some while not with others, making them subjective rather than absolute.

Ultimately, what each person believes or knows only needs to resonate with them, not anyone else. This holds true for everyone. Thus, we must strive to respect the beliefs of others, as long as they do not negatively impact anyone else. Religion, science, and the debates surrounding proof should not become contentious issues. If we all honor each other's right to choose and respect differing truths, the world would be a far better place, don’t you think? Let's commit to fostering this respect.

Blessings to all.