Chapter 1: The Rebranding Trend

You've probably caught wind of the significant news that a well-known tech giant is undergoing a name change. Yes, Overstock.com is rebranding itself to BedBathandBeyond.com!

But wait, did you think I was talking about Elon Musk's decision to switch Twitter.com to X? While that shift is certainly noteworthy, my focus here is on Overstock's move, as its management appears to have a clearer understanding of the potential pitfalls that can accompany a name change. It's easy to forget, but Overstock previously attempted a rebranding in 2011, opting to become O.co.

How did that transformation fare? Not so well...

The company invested hundreds of millions in advertising, including TV commercials and even rebranding the Oakland Coliseum as the O.co Coliseum. Unfortunately, the initiative backfired spectacularly. Many consumers mistakenly believed that ".co" was not a legitimate domain, leading them to search for "O.com" instead, which resulted in significant losses in website traffic.

Whoops!

The parallel between Overstock's brief stint as O.co and Twitter's recent rebranding is compelling, particularly regarding the reasons behind the name changes. Overstock's leadership believed that their original brand was limiting their ability to branch out into more lucrative markets, such as luxury goods and high-end electronics. They faced challenges in securing products from suppliers who were hesitant to associate their offerings with the "overstock" label, and consumers were often reluctant to pay premium prices for items that seemed like excess inventory.

In Elon Musk's case, one might question whether a similar motivation exists. Reports suggest that he is rebranding Twitter to X in hopes of developing an all-in-one app akin to WeChat in China, which would facilitate everything from news consumption to making phone calls and processing payments. While it may seem odd to manage various transactions on a platform called "Twitter," one could argue that the name "WeChat" is equally unconventional for such a multifunctional app.

Regardless, Overstock's brief foray into O.co serves as an intriguing lens through which to view the future of the company formerly known as Twitter. Much like Overstock, which struggled to shift consumer perceptions with its new name, Twitter has an established brand that users trust. The transition to X, however, lacks that familiarity, raising concerns about Musk's strategy, especially given Twitter's current financial and user retention challenges.

Interestingly, Overstock is also pivoting once again, having acquired the intellectual property rights for the bankrupt retailer Bed Bath & Beyond, rebranding its U.S. and Canadian websites to BedBathandBeyond.com.

But why does Overstock's leadership believe that transitioning to BedBathandBeyond.com will succeed where their O.co attempt did not? The answer lies in brand equity!

The Bed Bath & Beyond name is already well-known and trusted by consumers, providing Overstock with an opportunity to shed its "overstock" label without necessitating a new brand introduction. This strategic move is likely to yield significant benefits for Overstock moving forward.

I suspect Elon Musk may be aiming for something similar with his own rebranding strategy. He has long held aspirations of creating a massive entity named X, dating back to his early ventures, including an online banking platform called X.com, which he sold to PayPal.

While I commend Musk for pursuing his vision, it's important to note that he is not merely adopting an established brand like Bed Bath & Beyond; rather, the broader public lacks the same familiarity with the X brand as he does.

If Musk is intent on rebranding Twitter as X, he might consider a more gradual approach. Perhaps launching a "TwitterX" premium subscription service could allow for a smoother integration of the X branding into the existing business model, gradually expanding until it supersedes Twitter.

Or, he could explore different strategies altogether.

Ultimately, I have no personal stake in this transition; I don’t frequently tweet—rather, I “X”? Regardless, as someone invested in the world of business and branding, I find it disheartening to witness a well-established brand being so readily diminished.

Why would someone choose to dismantle such a valuable brand without caution?

I may never fully understand that decision. However, if I were ever in a position to oversee a prominent brand, I would prioritize its value and integrity above nearly everything else—something that should apply universally. Brands serve as the entry points for consumers into your products, and once damaged, repairing that trust can be a costly endeavor. Overstock's history serves as a cautionary tale, and it appears that the team behind X may soon learn this lesson as well.

For those seeking further insights on startups and entrepreneurship, consider enrolling in a (FREE) mini-course with me!

Chapter 2: Insights from Elon Musk's Vision

In this segment, we explore Elon Musk's perspective on trust and the challenges he faces as he navigates the rebranding of Twitter.

Chapter 3: The Future of Disruption

This video discusses Musk's ambitions to disrupt numerous industries through his various companies and what that could mean for the future.