Elon Musk's Profit Strategies for Twitter: A Misguided Approach
Written on
Chapter 1: The Quest for Profitability
In recent weeks, Elon Musk has made headlines as he prepared to acquire Twitter. Throughout this process, he has shared a variety of unconventional thoughts. One of the more peculiar suggestions he reportedly presented to financiers involved charging external websites for the ability to embed or quote tweets from verified users and companies.
This proposal isn't entirely unexpected, given Musk's focus on enhancing Twitter's financial viability. Along with contributing $21 billion in cash, he is also taking on approximately $25 billion in debt—half from a margin loan linked to Tesla shares, and the other half from bank loans and high-risk bonds backed by Twitter's cash flow. To persuade lenders to back these loans, which will incur nearly $1 billion in interest annually—surpassing Twitter's current earnings—Musk needed to present strategies for increasing the company's revenue. Among his suggestions were workforce reductions and the contentious idea of monetizing tweets, which seems to stem from a misunderstanding of Twitter's operational dynamics.
While Musk's notion of charging for tweet embeds is legally feasible—since users retain copyright over their tweets, and Twitter's terms allow it to license that content—there are significant technical and user-related obstacles that could undermine its effectiveness.
Section 1.1: Technical Challenges
The primary technical issue is clear: although Twitter could impose fees on third-party sites for embedding tweets, it cannot prevent them from taking screenshots and incorporating those images into their content. Contrary to Musk's implications, Twitter cannot levy charges on sites for merely quoting or screenshotting tweets, provided those quotes are not excessively lengthy. Thus, imposing fees on embedding could lead to a reduction in its use by news outlets and other platforms, resulting in minimal revenue increases. Additionally, such a strategy could limit traffic to Twitter, as embedding tweets typically directs users back to the platform—something that wouldn’t happen with static images.
Subsection 1.1.1: User Exploitation Concerns
Moreover, Musk's proposal would starkly highlight Twitter's reliance on user-generated content for its business model. As I previously discussed for Fast Company, the fundamental issue for Twitter—and many social media platforms—is its lack of original content. Instead, it thrives on monetizing the contributions users provide without compensation. This dependence is particularly pronounced with influential users, whose posts drive significant engagement on the platform. Currently, this arrangement is perceived as relatively equitable, with users exchanging their content for greater visibility. However, implementing a fee for their content would create a perception of exploitation, which could alienate users.
Section 1.2: The Consequences of Charging for Content
If Twitter were to initiate charges for tweet embedding, it would likely lead to fewer embedded tweets, thereby reducing their visibility and readership. In essence, Twitter would profit from user content while simultaneously diminishing the exposure users receive. This is an unsustainable approach.
Chapter 2: A Misalignment of Interests
In the video "Character Limit: How Elon Musk Destroyed Twitter," Kate Conger and Ryan Mac discuss the implications of Musk's strategies and the potential risks they pose to the platform's user base and overall viability.
In another insightful video, "Elon Musk on Advertisers, Trust and the 'Wild Storm' in His Mind," Musk elaborates on his vision for Twitter and the challenges of balancing user interests with revenue generation.
Musk may have been brainstorming, but his suggestions—such as charging for embeds or eliminating content moderation—reveal a misunderstanding of Twitter's ecosystem. Users are not merely customers; they are essential contributors to the platform's value. Any strategy aimed at significantly boosting Twitter's profitability must prioritize user engagement and retention. It appears that Musk has yet to recognize this critical aspect, and it is essential that he does so before finalizing the deal.